| www.GGHjournal.com | Return to Orginal Format | ||
|
Adult Height in Turner Syndrome |
|||
| Volume 21, Issue 4, December 2005 © 2005 Prime Health Consultants, Inc. |
|||
|
Although it has long been recognized that growth hormone (GH) treatment increases the adult height of those with Turner syndrome, this Canadian study is the first randomized controlled trial carried through to adulthood. Girls with Turner syndrome, aged 7–13 years, were randomly assigned to either receive GH treatment (0.30 mg/kg /wk by subcutaneous injection 6 times per week; n = 76) or to be a part of an untreated control group (C) that did not receive GH treatment (n = 78). Sex hormone replacement was used to induce puberty in both cohorts at age 13 years if onset did not occur spontaneously. Growth hormone treatment lasted on average 5.7 years. Protocol completion required an annualized height velocity of <2 cm/yr and a bone age of 14 years or greater. There were 104 patients (61 GH, 43 C) that completed the protocol (50 withdrew). At protocol completion, mean heights were 147.5 ± 6.1 cm (GH) and 141.0 ± 5.4 cm (C) (P<0.001). Girls who started GH at an earlier age showed a greater increase in adult height (+0.22 SD, 95% CI 0.10–0.33 SD, or +1.5 cm/yr for each year of earlier GH initiation [P<0.001]), although this age effect was highly variable between patients. Two follow-up visits further verified the adult height and assessed safety. For those available at least 1 year after protocol completion (n = 59; 40 GH, 19 C), mean heights were 149.0 ± 6.4 (GH) and 142.2 ± 6.6 cm (C) (P<0.001). The estimated height gain attributable to GH was +7.2 cm at protocol completion (CI = 6.0–8.4), and +7.3 cm (CI = 5.4–9.2) at follow-up (at least 1 year after protocol completion). This report was accompanied by an editorial by Carel, in which he chronicled the history of GH treatment for short stature in Turner syndrome. Carel estimated that height gains across studies ranged from “minimal” to 17 cm for high-dose GH treatment. He applauded the Canadian researchers for adopting a powerful research design and carefully following participants. Although he noted that GH treatment unquestionably increased adult height in women with Turner syndrome, he posed a number of provocative questions regarding the cost-effectiveness and safety of GH in this population. Editor’s Comment: Although some readers may view the study’s findings as old news, the accompanying editorial highlights details of its importance. By contrasting these findings with those from a recently published report of a French population-based cohort of GH-treated patients,1 several important questions/observations arise, as succinctly summarized in the Carel editorial. First, insofar as adult height gained (2.7–11.7 cm for those initiating treatment between 7-13 years) varies substantially across patients, most importantly attributable to age at treatment initiation, Carel asks whether GH should be used if only a minor effect is anticipated. Second, Carel claims that adult height gained with GH is not a validated proxy measure for “quality of life” which he identifies as the primary rationale for treatment. In his study, 88% of young adult participants favorably rated their GH treatment. However, when asked to estimate the minimal height gain they thought would make GH treatment worthwhile, the figure was above 8 cm in 64% of cases. Thus, based on adult heights achieved in the French cohort, two-thirds of patients treated with GH in the Canadian trial and many other studies would not consider treatment “worthwhile.” Third, findings from this study cannot be extrapolated to adult height outcomes that might be achieved should GH treatment be initiated earlier than 7 years or using higher doses. Finally, Carel focuses on the safety profile of GH treatment. He acknowledges that the overall safety record is good, but cites 2 studies that linked GH therapy with a heightened risk of otitis media. Furthermore, the presence of hearing difficulties in adulthood was found to be a robust predictor of a more negative quality of life in Turner syndrome patients. GH treatment and the associated theoretical risk for cancer was also noted, and careful monitoring of IGF-I levels and long-term follow-up studies were recommended. David E. Sandberg, PhD Reference - (linked to |
|||