|
|
www.gghjournal.com | Return to original format |
| Neonatal Exendin-4 Prevents the Development of Diabetes in the Intrauterine Growth Retarded Rat | ||
| Volume 19, Issue 4, 2003 | ||
| © 2003 Prime Health Consultants, Inc. | ||
|
Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) has
been shown to be associated with significant adult morbidity,
including insulin resistance, reduced pancreatic β-cell mass, and
subsequent type 2 diabetes. Uteroplacental insufficiency, a cause of
IUGR, limits the availability of substrates, growth factors, and
hormones to the fetus. A rat model of IUGR can be induced with
bilateral uterine artery ligation at 19 days of the 22 day gestation
period. In rats during the newborn period there is extensive
remodeling of the pancreas brought about by β-cell replication,
neogenesis and apoptosis. A second wave of neogenesis occurs during
weaning.
The incretin hormone glucagon-like polypeptide-1 (GLP-1) stimulates pancreatic neogenesis and increases β-cell mass. Therefore its administration to rat pups who have undergone 90% partial pancreatectomy results in an increase in both β-cell mass and improved glucose homeostasis. Exendin-4 is a long-acting GLP-1 which in addition to the aforementioned activities stimulates expression of Pancreatic Duodenal Homeobox (PDX) protein in the pancreas. PDX is critical for the early development of both the endocrine and exocrine pancreas and mediates glucose responsive stimulation of transcription of the insulin gene. Stoffers and colleagues treated IUGR rat pups with exendin-4 during the early postnatal period to study its effects on the subsequent development of type 2 diabetes. Four groups of rat pups were studied: (1) control pups given vehicle injection, (2) control pups given exendin-4 injections, (3) IUGR pups given vehicle injections, and (4) IUGR pups given exendin-4 injections. Injections were administered on postnatal days 1 through 6. Glucose tolerance, β-cell mass, β-cell proliferation and PDX gene expression were measured at 14 days and 3 months of age. Glucose tolerance was also determined at 7 weeks and 8 months of age. Exendin–4 decreased weights in both control and IUGR pups (Groups 2 and 4) at 2 weeks. This decrease persisted into adulthood (Table). At day 14, glucose tolerance in the IUGR pups treated with exendin-4 was similar to that in control animals. The treated animals remained euglycemic at 8 months. Vehicle–treated IUGR pups (Group 3) developed diabetes by 3 months and died by 8 months of age. Exendin-4 treated IUGR pups (Group 4) had normal β-cell mass comparable to that in Group 1 as the result of normalized replication rates. While Pdx-1 mRNA levels were reduced by 60% in IUGR rats not receiving exendin-4 at 14 days, those treated with exendin-4 had normal levels. The authors state their major finding is that a short treatment with exendin-4 during the early newborn period prevents the development of diabetes in the IUGR rat. It is not clear whether this effect is through the stimulation of Pdx-1. However, the effect is independent of β-cell mass, since its effects were observed prior to any reduction in the IUGR pancreatic mass. They suggest that the permanent improvement in maintenance of β-cell mass by exendin-4 may mean that similar drugs could be effective in reducing the risk or preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus in individuals born with IUGR. The negative part of the study was the growth inhibiting effect of exendin-4. Stoffers DA, et al. Diabetes 2003;52:734-740. Editor’s Comment: These fascinating data suggest that possibly there may be a treatment available in the future for the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus in IUGR individuals, if treated early in the neonatal period. Stoffers and colleagues have shown using an IUGR rat model that exendin-4 given for a short period of time postnatally can prevent glucose intolerance by restoring Pdx-1 function and normalizing β-cell proliferation rates. One cannot read this study without thinking about other morbidity associated with IUGR and how other treatments administered in the neonatal period might someday become available to treat those as well. The obvious example would be treatment given early to restore normal growth velocity. These authors have presented data that opens up a whole new world of possibilities. William L. Clarke, MD |
||