Because
multiple laboratory tests are used in the diagnosis and
management of this disease, the quality of the scientific
evidence supporting the use of these assays varies.
Therefore, an expert committee drafted evidence-based
recommendations for the use of laboratory analysis in patients
with DM. An external panel of experts (DB Sacks, DE Bruns,
DE Goldstein, NK Maclaren, JM McDonald and M
Parrott) reviewed a draft of the
guidelines, which were modified in response to the reviewers’
suggestions, and other steps were taken to gain a consensus of
expert opinions. The guidelines, as published in Clinical
Chemistry, consist of an Executive Summary of one page providing
specific recommendations based on data published or expert
consensus. Several analyses are of minimal clinical value
at the present time and measurement of them is not recommended.
The entire article is 42 pages. Those clinicians treating
diabetics should at least scan the article and closely
scrutinize the Executive Summary.
Highlignts of the Executive Summary
are now presented:
Glucose should be measured in an
accredited laboratory to establish the diagnosis of DM and to
screen high-risk individuals. Blood should be drawn after
an overnight fast. Glucose should be measured in plasma.
If plasma cannot be separated from cells within 60 minutes, a
tube with glycolytic inhibitor should be used. On the
basis of biological variation, glucose analysis should have
analytical imprecision less than 3.3%, bias less than 2.5%, and
total error less than 7.9%.
The OGTT is not recommended for the
routine diagnosis of type 1 or 2 DM. The key limitation of
the OGTT is its poor reproducibility. It is recommended for
establishing the diagnosis of gestational DM.
Because of the imprecision and
variability among glucose meters, they should not be used to
diagnose DM and have limited value in screening.
Noninvasive glucose analyses cannot be recommended at present as
replacements for plasma glucose or measurements by an accredited
laboratory. Glycated hemoglobin (GHB) should be
measured at least biannually in all patients with DM. US
laboratories should use GHB assays certified by the
National GH Standardization Program (NGSP) as traceable to the
DCCT reference. GHB levels should be maintained
at <7% and the treatment regimen should be reevaluated if GHB
is >8% as measured by NGSP - certified methods.
Routine measurement of genetic
markers is not recommended for the diagnosis or management of
patients with DM. Likewise, autoimmune markers lack
specificity and are not recommended for routine diagnosis or
screening of DM.
An annual search for micro
albuminuria should be performed on patients without clinical
proteinuria. To be useful, semiquantitative or
quantitative screening tests must be shown to be positive in
>95% of patients with micro albuminuria. Positive results
must be confirmed by quantitative testing in an accredited
laboratory.
All adults with DM should receive
annual lipid profiles.
Sacks DB, et al. Clinical
Chemistry 2002;48:3,436-472.
Editor’s Comment:
This is only the very essential infrastructure of the Executive
Summary. The article is endowed with significant
substance.
Robert M. Blizzard, MD