This study performed
meta-analyses of all randomized controlled intervention trials that
completed the assessment of the effects of zinc supplementation on the
serum zinc concentrations and physical growth of pre-pubertal
children. A total of 33 acceptable studies with appropriate data were
identified by MEDLINE searches and other methods. Weighted mean
effect sizes were calculated for changes in height, weight,
weight-for-height, and serum zinc concentrations. The authors used
random-effects models, extrapolated by meta-regression techniques.
Zinc supplementation
produced highly significant, positive responses in height (+0.35 SDS)
and weight (+0.39 SDS) increments. Zinc supplementation caused a
large increase in the children's serum zinc concentrations (+0.82).
Growth responses were greater in children with low initial
weight-for-age z scores, and in those aged more than 6 months with low
initial height-for-age z scores.
The authors
concluded that interventions to improve the zinc nutriture of children
should be considered in populations at risk of zinc deficiency,
especially and particularly in those where there are elevated rates of
children who are underweight or experience stunting.
Editor’s Comments:
The benefits of zinc supplementation for children’s growth have been
debated for many years. This meta-analyses conducted by Brown et al
showed that zinc supplements probably are of benefit for children in
developing countries. It is not surprising that in such populations
there are nutrient deficits which can be corrected by specific
nutrient supplementation. Underlining the potential nutritional
deficiency status of the population studied and reported,
there was a higher significant aggregate zinc effect on children’s
growth in those who exhibited deficits of body weight for height. It
might also be inferred that children who do not exhibit growth
retardation or body weight-for-height deficits might not be
nutrient-deficient, and may, therefore, not benefit from zinc
supplementation. It should also be kept in mind that zinc deficiency
is difficult to document, and that zinc supplementation,
either alone or in combination with other
nutrients, is not easily accomplished nor tolerated by
children. Zinc supplements are also expensive where they might be
needed the most, namely in developing countries. The foods richest in
zinc are from animal sources which are also often not accessible in
these countries. Children in the United States and other developed
countries who ingest a wide variety of meat products are highly
unlikely to be zinc deficient.
I agree with the
authors who state in the last paragraph of this article “Because of
the important functional consequences of zinc deficiency for
children’s growth and other health outcomes, interventions to improve
zinc nutriture should be considered in those populations at
particularly high risk of zinc deficiency. Additional research will
be needed to determine whether the mean serum zinc concentration of a
population is a useful predictor of response to zinc supplementation.
On the other hand, the population mean
serum zinc concentration does increase after supplementation, so this
measure can be used to indicate whether public health interventions to
promote increased zinc intakes are successful.” For those interested
in this topic, reviewing the original manuscript and its excellent and
extensive graphic expression of data will be appreciated.
Fima
Lifshitz, MD