This study from Leiden
University in the Netherlands dealt with changes in health-related
quality of life (HRQOL) and self-esteem in children with idiopathic
short stature (ISS) participating in a study on the effects of growth
hormone (GH) treatment. There were 36 pre-pubertal children who were
randomly assigned to a treatment or to a control group. Children, their
parents and their pediatricians completed a HRQOL and a self-esteem
questionnaire, 3 times in 2 years. The data indicated that children
with ISS did not have lower scores at the start as compared with the
normal population, except for social functioning. The pediatricians
noticed an improvement in HRQOL in the children in the treatment group.
Those in the treatment group did grow significantly more than those in
the control group. However, the parents and the children being treated
reported no change in HRQOL. Indeed, in some instances they reported
being worse than before. The child’s
satisfaction with height was more related to HRQOL than was measured
height. The authors concluded
that the assumption that growth hormone treatment improves HRQOL or
self-esteem in children with short stature could not be supported by
this study.
First Editor’s
Comments:
It is widely assumed that short stature may be a handicap and that this
condition may result in psychosocial problems, such as ridicule, and
mascotism. Indeed, short people might be
victims of discrimination and prejudice, often referred to as “heightism”.
For that reason, many have opted to receive GH with the intent to
accelerate growth and improve the final adult height, and in that way
improve their psychosocial status. The response to GH treatment in
these children appears to be modest, resulting in a possible gain in
final height of 5–9 cm, after many years of treatment. However, few
studies have approached the concept of HRQOL as an outcome measure of
this treatment. In this study, children with a height of more than two
standard deviations below the mean for age and sex, who were not GH
deficient, were found to have appropriate HRQOL and self-esteem, and did
not show improvements after GH treatment. The parent’s opinion about
their social competence after treatment was also not changed. Of
interest was the lack of agreement between the informants, who were the
patients and parents, with the pediatrician’s perception of the effects
on quality of life after GH. The relationship between stature, growth,
HRQOL and self-esteem might be determined by the expectations of the
participants rather than by the improvements in growth. These children,
as well as their parents, might have had unrealistic expectations and,
therefore, not be satisfied with the treatment, despite improved
standard deviation scores for height. Therefore, when we undertake
treatment of a non-growth hormone deficient short child, we should
consider aspects other than height. GH treatment should not be initiated
just because the child is short. An interesting editorial accompanied
this article and was written by Basil J. Zitelli in the same issue of
the journal, and the reader is encouraged to review that as well. (Journal
of Pediatrics 2002;140:493-495).
Fima
Lifshitz, MD
Second Editor’s
Comment:
Dr. Zitelli in his commentary points out with emphasis that offering
children and parents therapy for short stature raises expectations of
success. Motivation to be included in GH trials frequently involved the
hope of gaining height, yet if expectations were not met through
therapy, poor self-esteem and parental anxiety and disappointment were
acutely felt by the child. With the variability and unpredictability of
results for any particular child, GH therapy becomes an intervention
that may be more detrimental than the original complaint of short
stature.
Investigators have added another layer of therapy to enhance growth. To
delay epiphyseal fusion, gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists have
been added to GH treatment regimens. This may potentially compound the
iatrogenically introduced fear in the normal short child of being
abnormal or affected with a disease that requires 2 medications to
treat.
The last issue (GGH 2002 Vol 18:3) has an abstract and commentary
regarding the use of LHRHa in advanced
puberty. The conclusion of the authors was “these data suggest that
advanced puberty (as differentiated from sexual precocity defined as
sexual development in girls before the age of 8 years and boys below 9
years) decreases the growth potential by about 5 cm and that
GnRHa therapy does not prevent this”.
Robert M. Blizzard, MD
Print
version (pdf) |
Printer-Friendly